Re: OT-Tonight's episode, "As YouWere"; an invitation for

[Nathan Campbell <NathanCampbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

discussion
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 05:27:29 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Uh, hey everybody.
I have a confession to make.
After a short but busy period of time recently that involved a
combination of net access troubles and other RL concerns, I got
complacent and lazy and let the feedback go. I have no excuse, as the
busy period was maybe about 5% of the time since I stopped fbing. I'm
sorry. It won't happen again - I promise. Uh, might now be a good time
to mention that what fic has shown up has been great (I ask with a
sheepish grin)?

Nathan Campbell
NathanCampbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx

When sun sprays the earth
with straight-falling flames,
a cricket rubs his wings,
scraping up thin sweet song.
-Sappho


buffywantswillow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:03:00 -0800 (PST)
> From: danspector@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: OT-Tonight's episode, "As YouWere"; an invitation for
discussion
> 
> Thoth,
> 
> Thanks. Kevlar long-johns indeed <g>. I'm smiling now, and I'm not
> even going to "thwap" you for the lack of Spoiler Space, because it
> really wasn't that spoilery. And anyway, I'm too glad to have the
> momentary happy you just gave me.
> 
> On your entirely-excusable absence: yes, one thing I have noticed is
> that we've lost all our compulsive fbers. I don't fb everything, but
> there was a small group that always had a word or two for any author,
> and they were greatly appreciated. I know Sammy Koala is still a
> prisoner of the evil adults, but I would love it if you could return to
> your former role, if it ever becomes possible.
> 
> Along those lines, Panda Mel, we miss your little bursts of fb. And
> where is Nathan Campbell (also much missed) these days, anyhow?
> 
> Actually, now that I think of it, I and others may actually BE fbing
> every fic that comes along these days, it's just that the ficcing has
> slowed to a trickle. Which is a subject for another post.
> 
> Because I need to start fresh on that subject. And also to boost the
> post count, of course. :)
> 
> Dan