Re: OT: Threesomes

["mysticalcat44" <Solarsenshi@xxxxxx>]

That my friend I wouldn't call a triad anymore but a simple love 
triangle...
And that's the last I'm going to say to all this... yeah, as if... ;)

Matthias

--- In buffywantswillow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Blin Vizzable" 
<debvii@y...> wrote:
> --- In buffywantswillow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Matthias Engel" 
> 
> > The true masterpiece though would be
> > mending a threesome between them without any relationship 
> previously.
> 
> Well, personally, I think the neatest thing would be for writers to 
> tackle the challenge of the unbalanced triad (where not every party 
> is involved with every other party). Frankly, that's the only 
> conception of, for example, B-W-T that makes sense to me. Were I 
> ever to write down anything that's in my head, I'd do B-W-Oz that 
way.
> 
> The "Games" series is (*IIRC*) the only work I've read that tries 
to 
> address this (and I TOTALLY DIG that series, btw). But as my eyes 
> tend to roll back at the sight of W/T {heh}, my knowledge of what's 
> out there may be inadequate.
> 
> blinviz