Re: OT: Possible change to Spoiler rules? (Was "OT: 'I don't see why' ")

["blinviz" <debvii@xxxxxxxxx>]

OK, colour me confused, cuz I thought that what BP and gussi described 
WERE the current rules. Use the title SPOILER and briefly indicate 
what (ep) it is you're spoiling before the spoiler space.

Am I wrong?

I suppose I should say a word about the "Dan, close your eyes" post 
instead of leaving Dan hanging. I started reading a post with the 
descriptor "spoilers for Seeing Red" and halfway thru I'm suddenly 
seeing statements of the type "We know that Person X will perform 
Action Y, yadda yadda" and the persons and actions certainly weren't 
stuff from the promo for "Villains". Indeed, before my brain locked up 
completely, I kenned that they appeared to be spoilers for the finale.

Frankly, I don't want to be spoiled for the finale. I've been spoiled 
some for the finale, but I'm trying to stay away from further spoilage, 
and the stuff I half-saw in Alnisa's post before I shut my mind down in 
horror and hit "Back" seemed rather specific and mega-mega-spoilery. I 
apologise if my admittedly incomplete comprehension was inaccurate.

Before this season, I was never spoiled for Buffy ("The Body" nearly 
killed me!), but then I met Casandra and fell from grace. {Heh, that 
part about Casandra really isn't true.} Anyway, after being spoiled 
rotten for Seeing Red, I decided that it just isn't the life for me. 
Others mileage may vary, but certainly we can respect differing POVs 
and reach some sort of rapprochement, yes?